Sharing the Legacy of a Dance Collection | By Marie Tollon

340 Bryant Street Studios, TwinSpace, The Goodman Building are just a few of the names to add to the running list of art spaces that have been forced to close in the past few years in the Bay Area. Sadly, it keeps lengthening, as each week seems to bring the news of another organization that has lost its lease. Naming these places fails to capture their liveliness, their contribution to the larger cultural fabric of the Bay Area, nor the individual and collective trajectories of the artists who made them thrive. With San Francisco’s “hyper-gentrification” and the closure of so many art spaces, how many stories are being aborted? How much is the cultural wealth of the city being stifled by voracious and massive financial transactions?

Photographs displayed on the wall at 66 Sanchez Photo by Priscilla Murray

Photographs displayed on the wall
at 66 Sanchez
Photo by Priscilla Murray

In most cases, the stories behind those arts organizations live solely through memory and the artists’ body, as Jess Curtis’s The Dance That Documents Itself demonstrated last fall at CounterPulse, and which selections will be presented at Walking Distance in June. But how else can we experience those stories and the memories that have survived?

In rare cases, objects are left behind, becoming the sole relics of moments in time that constitute the history of a place and are part of a community’s collective heritage. Such is the case with the 66 Sanchez Collection, partly on view in the lobby of ODC Theater until May 12. The collection belonged to the owner of 66 Sanchez, Gerald Arpino, co-founder of the Joffrey Ballet and its Artistic Director from 1988 to 2007. It includes posters, photographs, prints, books, sculptures, records, playbills, letters and personal effects that belonged to Arpino and his long-time partner and choreographic assistant James Howell.

Known as “Mr. A,” he bought the property at 64/66 Sanchez Street in the mid-1970s, soon after Howell left the Joffrey Ballet and moved to San Francisco to study physical therapy. Also a musical assistant and photographer, Howell taught class in the studio built at 66 Sanchez. After Howell’s death from AIDS complications in 1982, 66 Sanchez housed dancers and artists who kept the space alive, while Mr. A lived in his main residence in Chicago. He visited the property annually “to rest, stay in touch with friends and enjoy the marvels of the meticulously placed artifacts that lined the walls of the home’s kitchen, living room, staircases, dance studio and back porch,” Carlos Venturo, ODC School Registrar and one of the last residents, explains. “Through Mr. A’s generosity, professional dance artists lived in the house, and managed the dance studio activities while dancing and creating work in a variety of Bay Area dance companies.”

When Mr. A passed away in 2008, the house was put up for sale by his trust, its residents forced to leave and its artistic activities to cease. Two of the house’s last residents, Venturo and ODC/Dance Company Manager Joseph Copley, inherited the 66 Sanchez Collection. I sat down with them last week to talk about the collection and life at 66 Sanchez.

Marie Tollon: How did you come to live at 66 Sanchez?

Carlos Venturo: After dancing in Colorado for 5 years, I returned to San Francisco. A friend of mine lived at 66 Sanchez and invited me to stay with him. A few months later, a room opened up and I became one of the regulars – from 2001 to 2011. I started to take charge of the studio, book events, do maintenance. So I became very involved with the life of the house.

Joseph Copley: I moved in much later, as Carlos’ partner. When Carlos took over managing the activities of the studio, it became a very busy yoga center. RAWdance started the Concept series there; Amy Seiwert made a lot of ballet there; local drag performers would rehearse there – a lot of the Trannyshack members – Heklina, Peaches [Christ]- it became a really popular space. It had beautiful blond marley, and 8 gigantic skylights.

Inside 66 Sanchez Photo by Priscilla Murray

Inside 66 Sanchez
Photo by Priscilla Murray

MT: Was the collection on display?

CV: The house was covered with posters, except in the studio.

JC: You couldn’t tell which color the walls were!

MT: What was Gerald Arpino’s relationship to the house?

CV: When James Howell died, he never wanted to sell the house. It was a place for him to get away. There are many Joffrey connections here in the Bay Area. So he had lots of friends to visit. He would socialize and go to the ballet, visit the dancers. Sometimes he would get up on stage and give them notes! He was a very eccentric person. He was very entertaining and incredibly generous. He was mostly gone: at least 11 months of the year, it was just us. There was a bank account where we deposited all the payments, and rents, that sustained the place. When we were living there, the studio was sustaining itself. It was a way for us to demonstrate our gratefulness for having this place that we thought would last forever but was suddenly gone.

JC: Going back to the 70s and 80s, the Joffrey had a strong connection to San Francisco. They had seasons at the Opera House. [Gerald Arpino] would use the studio to make pieces. The Joffrey would rehearse there. We have a document of Mayor Diane Feinstein declaring “Gerald Arpino Day” in San Francisco!

MT: How did you inherit this collection?

CV: It was kind of a curse and a blessing, because we were the ones who happened to be there when [Gerald Arpino] died. His niece inherited everything. Little by little, she started to organize the estate. It took her a year to contact us. For a year after he died, we knew nothing. Nobody called us. The people we tried to contact suddenly didn’t work at the Joffrey anymore or we couldn’t reach them. For a year, we lived in a limbo, not knowing what was going to happen. First they sent a family member to come and take a look at the house. From that visit, it was another year until we received the visit of a real estate agent, who was very aggressive. That was 2010. From 2010, it took a year until we had to leave. Ultimately there was a family who was interested and ended up buying it. They were very well intentioned but it is impossible to be in good terms with the people who are going to kick you out. So we hired a lawyer who took over all the communication.

MT: What was the reaction in the dance community?

JC: There was an amazing outpour of support. When we heard from Mr. Arpino’s family, I started reaching out to people asking that they write a letter in support of keeping this property. I tried to have it registered as a national landmark. Everybody stepped up: Wayne Hazzard, Margie Jenkins, David Gordon who had visited us, Amy Seiwert, RAWdance, all the yoga teachers… We had a big fundraiser party to help with the cost of the move and everybody came and was very generous.

CV: Mr. Arpino’s niece never came to visit the place. She said that it was probably more valuable to us than to her, and probably [consisted of] copies of things that the family already had. By the time they got to us, they had to sort his Chicago’s property. It was probably more work than they had ever anticipated. She said that if we left everything, it would become the property of the new owners or we could take it if we wanted. We started the process of cleaning and discovering things we didn’t know were there. It was a massive endeavor. I stopped working and it became my full time job for 6 months.

JC: The entire third story of the house was an attic full of dance-related things. Sorting through things gave us the opportunity to look at each piece individually. In the house they were so cramped together that you took them in as a whole. To look at each of them one at a time and take the time to catalogue was really special.

The library at 66 Sanchez  Photo by Priscilla Murray

The library at 66 Sanchez
Photo by Priscilla Murray

MT: Where do you keep the collection?

JC: We have a 10 by 10 [foot] storage space that is totally full. When this was first happening, we reached out to the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts, the Museum of Performance and Design, the Dance Heritage Collection, everyone we could think of. And while everyone thought it was a fascinating story, nobody had the means and resources to move and archive the collection. They told us to hold on to it. But we don’t really have the resources to clean, archive and store it, so the problem is still there! The good news is that James Howell was very meticulous and the back of every picture has who did the lighting, who was dancing, on what stage, the name of the piece, what year… But when it comes to the slides, we have so many negatives, organized by date and place.

CV: It’s sad and expensive to see them in storage. It’s nice to give them light and share them with people who have no idea. We’ve had some appraisers come in. They told us that the value is in the collection itself. They have quoted us $30,000 to do the work of archiving all the pieces. Everything that we’ve found along the search was fascinating: autographed photographs, books that were given to them.

JC: A beautiful note that Mr. Arpino passed to James Howell, especially when he was sick, saying “get well soon”. When you look through books, you find these little notes.

MT: Has there been any interest from the Joffrey ballet?

CV: It became interesting to me to keep the collection here, in the West. It’s so unique that something from the East made it here in this shape. Part of the value is that it is here.

JC: The Joffrey School did show some interest but just in some photographs that were school related. So once again we come up against this problem of people who just want a little bit but we are trying to keep the collection as a whole. There are some photographs that are unique in that they are well documented. I remember some visitors coming and wanting to put Mr. A’s ballet back and the photographs in our house are the only documentation of an old ballet.

CV: Some dancers who were in the Joffrey want to take a piece with them. But it’s not the vision that I see for this collection of having a history that should belong to everybody.

JC: When [the collection] was in the house, everyone had access to it. Friends borrowed books; students at St Mary used the library for their research paper. Now, not intentionally, we have locked it away from everybody. That doesn’t feel right.

In addition to the lobby gallery open to the public, more pieces from the 66 Sanchez Collection will be shared during ODC Theater’s annual Indulge event for one night only on May 12, 2015.

 

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: